Therealworldno.blogspot.com

Thanks for original news poster.

Popularity: 1%

Just in case you are looking for even more information on 2012, I saw an article you should read. It is an interview with actor Dan Aykroyd about UFOs and 2012, which Aykroyd believes will signal the end of the world as we know it.

He thinks “the UFO phenomenon is going to figure greatly” in a 2012 revelation, when “the end of the world will come.”

“It won’t be the end of the world physically as we know it, as depicted in the movie. But it will be the end of consciousness and the end of perception as we know it.”

Check it out at Aykroyd and the End of the World, and see if you agree with me.

Just like many of you, although I have loved some of Akyroyd’s movies, I must say, this is a bunch of malarky.

Dan Aydroyd and 2012 originally appeared on About.com UFOs / Aliens on Wednesday, March 17th, 2010 at 02:19:24.

Permalink | Comment | Email this

Popularity: 1%

Therealworldno.blogspot.com

Thanks for original news poster.

Popularity: 1%

Therealworldno.blogspot.com

Thanks for original news poster.

Popularity: 1%

UFOs: Deconstructing Sereda

“Some times a cigar is just a cigar” Freud

The UFO community is full of skeptics who believe UFOs are indeed something vital, but who are very rigid in their interpretations of evidence and witnesses. You know my stance on how they treat some of the excellent UFO witnesses. But honest skeptics are very vital as a balancing act for those who accept nearly any report even when it has been disproven. For me, to disprove a report you have to cover all the bases of the report. If you cherry pick data in your analysis then you are proving nothing in my eyes. If someone reports a UFO and lives near an airport, and a skeptic proves that one part of the report fits the description of a plane but then he/she leaves out those parts of the report that challenges that interpretation, you’ve become a debunker in my eyes.
But, what if a skeptic disproves, rather conclusively, a report you were emotionally attached to, a report you thought would never quite be clarified? Well for me, one measure of a person is how he responds when what he believed turns out to be probably incorrect. I was a strong supporter of the Sereda interpretation of the objects witnessed around the well-known “NASA Tether Incident”. NASA had touted, before the release of a twelve mile long tether into the atmosphere, how this experiment may herald a source of powerful energy which could be used instead of rockets to raise the orbit of the shuttle in the future. Of course, the tether broke and caused even more controversy when it was filmed. After the NASA film was analyzed (thanks to the now departed Martin Stubbs) by David Sereda, a UFO researcher, David found some striking anomalies around the drifting tether. There, on the NASA video, was what looked like a swarm of round objects moving in different directions behind the tether. The tether was so far away, the objects would have to be huge. These objects seemed to be propelled on their own, and unlike ice crystals, had a spinning pattern to them. They all had the same notch. Light seemed to be emanating from the objects, not from tumbling reflections of “ice crystals”.
Below is a clip of the tether incident and David Sereda’s theory:

As you can see there are a fantastic deal of question surrounding these objects. Sereda went on to try to build a possible new physics around the these objects’ appearance and behavior. But when I was at the 2009 International UFO Congress, Mark D’Antonio an astronomer, and chief MUFON video analyst, made a presentation of the Tether Incident and other anomalies . He had his own close encounter and I don’t reckon he is in any way an unbeliever
. “UFO Hunters” program had demonstrated how an object zoomed in on “can appear to be behind an object when in fact it is really in front of it”. Mark from MUFON’s analysis and his natural explanation, along with the UFO Hunters demostration has satisfied all of the questions I had on the tether incident so now it goes into my “clarified basket” (sorry, Stanton). What do you reckon?

Finally, I wanted to place a clip from Sereda’s investigations that show what I believe may be real UFOs.

All of us have a like/despise relationship with skeptics. But honest skeptics help us stay focused. There are many people at the conferences selling smoke and mirrors, turning off the all but the most ardent believers. This has to be countered with a touch of reality. The most vital item for me to remember is some UFOs are real craft and are not from here. I’ve not read or heard any argument that stands up to scrutiny against the overwhelming, independently verified, evidence of UFO crafts, for the last sixty years. Isn’t a person like Mark helping us say to the world (“we don’t need no stinking debunkers”) “ we have in our midst objective honest scientist which check the UFO data received and filter out was is not UFOs.”

Joseph Capp
UFO Media Matters
Non-Commercial Blog

Thanks to Original news poster.

Popularity: 1%

Therealworldno.blogspot.com

Thanks for original news poster.

Popularity: 1%

Therealworldno.blogspot.com

Thanks for original news poster.

Popularity: 1%

Therealworldno.blogspot.com

Thanks for original news poster.

Popularity: 1%